이정도면 합리적인 의심을 넘어 Evidence라고 할만하지 않을까요?

불소는 어린이 IQ발달을 저해합니다.

The Mother-Offspring Studies

The 7 Mother-Child Fluoride Studies

The Mother-Child studies reveal that the fetus is the most vulnerable to fluoride’s neurotoxicity. Six of the seven studies measured pregnant women’s urinary levels for fluoride and these levels were compared to the IQ of their offspring. Certain levels of fluoride in the pregnant women’s urine were found to significantly impact the IQ, or cognitive function, of the offspring at various ages (up to 12 years of age).  The most recent study by Till et al. (Nov 2019) investigated the effects on IQ from infants fed formula made in fluoridated communities vs infants in non-fluoridated areas. The loss of IQ occurred in the fluoridated communities. The largest study listed below by Green et al. (2019) is important as it was the first to include mother-child pairs in fluoridated and non-fluoridated cities in Canada. Children were tested between the ages of 3 and 4. Of note is that the U.S. fluoridates the drinking water at the same level as Canada (0.7 mg/L fluoride). The Bashash et al. (2017) study is the longest mother-offspring study, having tested the children at 4 years of age and again between 6-12 years. Three other studies (Thomas et al., 2017; Valdez Jiménez et al., 2017; Li et al., 2004) also correlated the urinary fluoride levels with reduced IQ in the offspring. The singular importance of the Till (2019), Green (2019), Bashash (2017) and Thomas (2017) studies is that the fluoride levels in the urine of the pregnant women are similar to what is found in adults living in fluoridated communities in the U.S. The first study to look at this correlation was the study by Li et al. (2004) in China.

The studies by Li et al (2004) and Chang et al., (2017), both from China, compared newborns (1 to 3 days old) and infants (at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of age) from women living in high-fluoride areas to those living outside these areas. The study by Valdez Jiménez et al. (2017) was confined to women and their offspring in high fluoride areas.

1. Till et al. (2019) reported lower IQ at between 3 and 4 years of age.

This newest study, released on November 18, is titled Fluoride exposure from infant formula and child IQ in a Canadian birth cohort. This study was funded by the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and published in Environment International. The authors “examined whether feeding status (breast-fed versus formula-fed) modified the impact of water fluoride and if fluoride exposure during fetal development attenuated this effect.” The mothers urinary fluoride (MUF) levels were used as a proxy of fetal fluoride exposure. A second model estimated the association between fluoride intake from formula and child IQ. According to the authors:

• Consumption of formula reconstituted with fluoridated water can lead to excessive fluoride intake.

• Breastfed infants receive very low intake of fluoride.

• We compared IQ scores in 398 children who were formula-fed versus breastfed during infancy.

• IQ scores were lower with higher levels of fluoride in tap water.

• The effect was more pronounced among formula-fed children, especially for nonverbal skills

  2. Green et al. (2019) reported lower IQ at between 3 and 4 years of age.

  Titled Association Between Maternal Fluoride ExposureDuring Pregnancy and IQ Scores in Offspring in Canada, and published in JAMA Pediatrics, this study took place in 6 Canadian cities with 512 mother-child pairs. Women living in areas with fluoridated tap water compared with nonfluoridated water had significantly higher mean urinary fluoride concentrations. A 1-mg/L increase in urinary fluoride levels was associated with a 4.49-point lower IQ score in boys, but there was no statistically significant association with IQ scores in girls. A 1-mg higher daily intake of fluoride among pregnant women was associated with a 3.66 lower IQ score in boys and girls. According to the authors, the urinary fluoride levels observed in this study are “typically found in white North American women.” This study was also funded by the U.S. NIEHS.

  3. Bashash et al. (2017) reported lower IQ at 4 years of age and between 6 to 12 years of age.

  This study by Bashash et al., titled Prenatal Fluoride Exposure and Cognitive Outcomes in Children at 4 and 6–12 Years of Age in Mexico, was published in September 2017 in the prestigious journal Environmental Health Perspectives
  
  The researchers followed up to 299 women-offspring pairs in Mexico during a 12-year period and reported that the fluoride levels in the urine of the pregnant women was the factor for a loss of 5 to 6 IQ points in the offspring at ages 4 and 6-12 years of age. The fluoride levels in the urine of the pregnant women are similar to what is found in adults in fluoridated communities in the U.S. This study, as well as the following one by Thomas et al., was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. NIEHS.

  4. Thomas et al. (2018) reported lower IQ in children between 1 to 3 years of age.

  This study by Thomas et al., titled, OPV – 2 Prenatal fluoride exposure and neurobehavior among children 1–3 years of age in Mexico, was presented at a conference on epidemiology in Germany in March 2018. Only the abstract of the study has been published in the journal Occupational & Environmental Medicine. This abstract reports pregnant women’s fluoride exposure is linked to lower IQ in their children at one- to three-years-old at levels commonly found in U.S. women. The authors of this study said that their findings “suggest higher in utero exposure to fluoride has an adverse impact on offspring cognitive development that can be detected earlier, in the first three years of life.”

  5. Valdez Jiménez et al. (2017) reported lower IQ between the ages of 3 to 15 months.

  This was the first mother-infant pair study performed by a team from three universities in Mexico. The study is titled In utero exposure to fluoride and cognitive development delay in infants by Valdez Jiménez et al. and was published in the journal Neurotoxicology on March 1, 2017. This study differs from the other two studies discussed above inasmuch as the pregnant women in the study lived in areas of high naturally occurring fluoride in the drinking water. The authors noted that “cognitive alterations in children born from exposed mothers to F could start in early prenatal stages of life.”

  • this study had 65 mother-baby pairs
  • the IQ testing took place between the ages of 3 to 15 months
  • this study took place in an area with high naturally occurring levels of fluoride in the drinking water (called endemic hydrofluorosis areas).
  • Over 81.5% of the samples of tap water were above 1.5 mg/l with the highest value of 12.5 mg/.
  • 33.8% of the births were pre-term. The authors stated, “We found higher levels of F in urine across trimester in premature compared with full term.”
  • The authors state, “In this study near to 60% of the children consumed contaminated water and the prevalence of children with IQ below 90 points was 25% in the control group (F urine 1.5 mg/g creatinine) in comparison with the 58% of children in the exposed group (F urine >5 mg/g creatinine)… Our data suggests that cognitive alterations in children born from exposed mothers to F could start in early prenatal stages of life.”

  6. Li et al. (2004) reported significant differences in the behavioral neurological assessment score in 1 to 3 day-old offspring

  This Chinese study, Effects of high fluoride level on neonatal neurobehavioral development, was first published in 2004, translated into English and re-published in 2008 in the journal Fluoride 41(2):165–170.

• Ninety-one full-term, normal neonates were randomly selected for observation, 46 were male and 45 female.

• A urine sample was collected after the pregnant women were hospitalized but before labor began

• The standard neonatal behavioral neurological assessment (NBNA) method was used for measurements, which were carried out by professionals (pediatric department physicians working in neonatal section trained in national NBNA training program)

• In the high fluoride group the urinary fluoride level averaged 3.58±1.47 mg/L, significantly higher than the normal range of 0.18–2.6 mg/L and was significantly different from the fluoride level in urine samples from the control group. When compared with the fluoride result in urine samples from the control group (1.74±0.96 mg/L), the difference is statistically very significant (p<0.01).

• The two study groups are located in the same area with similar climate, living habits, economic and nutritional conditions, and cultural backgrounds. There is no industrial fluoride contamination in the endemic fluoride or the non-endemic control area. As can be seen in Table 1, there was no statistically significant difference in the delivery mode, birth weight, infant length, and sex.

• As seen in Table 2, neonatal neurobehavioural assessment of the neonates from the high fluoride group and the control group indicated that the neurobehavioural capability and agonistic muscle tension from the high fluoride group were impaired, resulting in a statistically significant lower overall (total) assessment score than in the control group (p<0.05).

• Table 3 shows that the various neurobehavioral capabilities, such as non-biological visual, biological visual, and auditory directional reactions of the neonates from the high fluoride group lagged behind those of the control group with differences that are statistically significant (p<0.05).

  7. Chang et al. (2017) reported significant differences in the mental development index and psychomotor development index of the offspring at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of age.

  This study,  Analysis on the Effect of Coal-Burning Fluorosis on the Physical Development and Intelligence Development of Newborns Delivered by Pregnant Women with Coal-Burning Fluorosis, was conducted in China and published in the  Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic Diseases 32(8):872-873.

• • 118 newbors in this study: The Observation Group: 68 newborns from coal-burning high-fluoride areas (called endemic fluorosis areas). The Control Group: 50 full-term newborns delivered by healthy pregnant women.

• The type of test used: Mental development index (MDI) and psychomotor development index (PDI) (assessed using the Standardized Scale for the Intelligence Development of Children formulated by the Children Development Center of China [CDCC]).

• The body weight, body length, head circumference, chest circumference, upper arm circumference and top arm length of newborns in the observation group were all significantly lower than those in the control group, and their differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

• At 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after birth, the grades of body weight development and body-length development of infants in the control group were significantly higher than those in the observation group (P < 0.05);

• Both the Mental development index and the psychomotor development index of infants in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05).

• The socioeconomic status of all the three villages were the same in both endemic and control areas.

• The results suggest that maternal exposure to high levels of fluoride have a significant impact on the intelligence development of newborns.